Jan
“Spin” - The Psychology of Politics
The ongoing United States election has captured my attention and the interest of Canadians. Over the past few months, as I have watched the news updates, however, I have been surprised to learn that US politics use a number of words that are not generally used in everyday conversations. We hear words like “pundent”, “spin”, “superdelegates”, “caucus” and “misspeak” in the news but the more I pay attention to the debates, the more I realize that there is confusion about the meanings of these terms. A pundent seems to be someone who has enough knowledge and experience with politics to be able to not only analyze but also predict and advise. The part I haven’t figured out is what qualifications are required in order to be given this title and who, besides the media reporters, have the power to award the title to someone. It almost seems to be an honourary role. In fact, when someone is introduced on a panel that person often responds with humble protests that s/he is not deserving of being called a “pundent”.
“Spin” is the way that a candidate and their supporters perceive and market a situation. I have been surprised to hear candidates make comments that they lost an election because they were “outspent” or didn’t campaign in a state because they knew they weren’t favoured there. They might explain a “loss” by stating that they were “unknown” in the area or harmed by the media coverage. Spin is a “story” that is presented to justify poor performance or motivate voters to support a candidate financially, through volunteer work or with their ballot.
Superdelegates are party members who have been elected or appointed to the Democratic party. They are not only allowed a vote in their home district but also are given an additional vote at the party’s convention. (The Republicans do not have this designation). Superdelegates have “power” to Continue Reading »
